
Harley Lovegrove is an interim manager, specializing on change management assignments for large multi-national companies. He is one of the founding partners of The Bayard Partnership and author of the book 'Making a Difference' which was also published in Dutch, under the title: 'Maak het Verschil'
He formed his first company in 1978 at the age of 21 and has since taken up numerous interim management posts, working for a variety of businesses from high technology and software to petrochemical, transport, mobile telecommunications and apparel.
Archive
- 2010
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- 2009
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- 2008
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- 2007
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- Good Project Managers are hard to find!
- Interim Managers have never had it so good?
- Haircut - a joke about Interim Managers!
- The Importance of Prince2 or PMI certification for Interim Managers
- What is an Interim Manager?
- Welcome to The Interim Manager ' s Forum
- The Difference between consultants and interim managers
Don’t look at me, it’s not my fault!
On the weekend I gave a master class in project management to a group of highly experienced PMI certified project managers. Everything went according to plan until the end of the lecture when someone said “sorry Mr. Lovegrove but I don’t agree”. I couldn’t for the life of me work out what my student could not agree with.
My premise was that it is a sad fact of life that many projects simply do not deliver much benefit to the customer in the long run because most of the time they only try and tackle the symptoms of a problem and not its root causes.
“It is not the job of the project manager to challenge the project charter by asking ‘why are we doing this project, what problem are we solving and how will we know when it is solved? As a project manager (usually working for a subcontractor) I just have to deliver what I am given and not to cause problems” said my student.
He was not a beginner, and my point had been clear, when you look at the PMI methodology it is brilliant on how to run a project but the real problem ‘why’? is not really covered sufficiently. If it is not the project manager’s job to challenge the objective of the project charter, then who’s is it?
Even if the project sponsor is a gifted communicator it does not mean that they have necessarily fully considered the serious question of what is the root problem or problems that the project needs to solve? And even if they have, it might not be so clear. Perhaps the goals in the charter are not all measurable, perhaps they do not measure if the underlying problem will be solved at all?
So when our PMI project manager delivers his project, on time, on budget and to scope but then a year later his client has to accept that the problem still remains but maybe in another form, then the PM will simply say “Don’t look at me it’s not my fault, I am just the project delivery manager!”
For example: Your car not starting in the morning maybe down to the fact that the battery is flat. But just replacing the battery, nine times out of ten, only solves the problem for a short while. I believe that it is the role of the mechanic to look deeper, to ask the questions “why is it flat? Why is it not charging properly? What could be the root causes (fan belt, fault in electrical system, engine not tuned, driving style (only driving at night with all the equipment on) or a combination of all of these things? The problem of the battery could be simply down to age, but more often than not a number of other factors cause a flat car battery and if you ignore them, then you do not solve the root problem and all your efforts will be a waste of time.
For me there is no doubt. The moment that a project manager takes the charter and sets out to deliver it, then he or she is responsible for ensuring the project delivers what it set out to do in the first place, and if they are not sure what that is, then they shouldn’t begin to waste their client’s time and money until they do.
If the structure within which my student works does not allow for this, then perhaps he is not entirely to blame but something is seriously wrong and needs fixing.
Have a good week,
Harley
Newsletter
Recent comments
- Nienke Schipper-Pauw on Not with a bang but a whimper
- Jan on Back but not fully with it..
- Koen on Back but not fully with it..
- Richard on Back but not fully with it..
- Nina Schuman on Work-life balance! by Kurt De Ruwe
- harley on Work-life balance! by Kurt De Ruwe
- Nina Schuman on Work-life balance! by Kurt De Ruwe
- Karin on Work-life balance! by Kurt De Ruwe
- Kurt on The Dreamer’s Disease - Laurie Miller
- Johan Vanhaeren on Time for some time out
- Anonymous on Time for some time out
- Karin Maier on Time for some time out
- Peter Vandenabeele on Time for some time out
- Jan Prigge on Time for some time out
- Werner on A good deed every day?
Comments
I do have the same vision of my role as a Project Manager. I see myself as responsible for solving a problem, not just delivering anything more or less inline with a charter. My motivation comes from understanding the problem and subscribing to the approach or solution proposed, at least to a certain degree. Still, assuming perfection in the projects charter world, I'm wondering if this kind of good soldier approach to project management could not be useful sometimes ...
I could not agree more. Your student obviously belongs to a category of modern "tick-off a box" project managers who believe that independent thinking can only damage their career. Yes-men (or women). It is because of people like these that HR problems in large companies are often exacerbated (witness the recent series of suicides at France Télécom). But can you blame them? With all these invasive HR performance assessment and monitoring gimmicks that are the latest fad in large companies, the only concern of each and every "project manager" (and most managers are in charge of a "project", aren't they?) is to make sure that the buck does not stop at their doorstep. People who merely focus on delivering what is expected without causing problems ought to be demoted from their manager's status. A manager who does not think independently is not a manager!
Post new comment